PMO & Project Controls Health Check
Executive Summary
A structured health check for complex energy and infrastructure programmes.
How to Use the Tool
Use this as an initial structured discussion and screening instrument. Record evidence for each answer and identify items requiring deeper engineering review.
Screening Questions
- Governance and decision rights clear?
- Integrated master schedule credible?
- Cost baseline and forecast controlled?
- Risk register current and owned?
- Change control functioning?
- Progress measurement rules defined?
- EVM/KPIs appropriate?
- PMIS/data sources consistent?
- Executive reporting decision-oriented?
- Interfaces and dependencies actively managed?
- Recovery actions tracked to closure?
- Lessons and benefits transition planned?
Scored Assessment Worksheet
Score 0 = unknown/not established, 1 = initial/fragmented, 2 = defined but incomplete, 3 = established and evidenced.
Note: entries in this tool are not saved automatically. Please record or screenshot your results before leaving this page.
| Assessment Area | Score 0–3 | Evidence / Comment | Action Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | |||
| Master schedule | |||
| Cost/forecast | |||
| Risk | |||
| Change control | |||
| Progress measurement | |||
| KPIs/EVM | |||
| PMIS/data | |||
| Executive reporting | |||
| Interfaces | |||
| Recovery actions | |||
| Closeout/benefits |
Interpretation
- 0–14: low readiness, close major definition gaps before procurement or scale.
- 15–25: developing readiness, proceed with targeted studies and actions.
- 26–36: good initial readiness, validate critical assumptions and move to the next decision gate.
Priority Action Register
| Priority | Gap/Risk | Required Action | Owner | Target Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Related GSC Capabilities
Strategic Advisory, Engineering Excellence, Project Leadership, Training & Capacity Building.
Discuss this topic with GSC.
